chikaidestroyer: (Always suspicious)
Albert Silverberg ([personal profile] chikaidestroyer) wrote 2009-08-14 05:39 am (UTC)

[action // the meeting]

Codes require constant vigilance. We could establish a new code each meeting, for security's sake. Ideas on codes and their meanings?

The issue with relying on another group to explain the situation is that they should not be held responsible for something everyone in the village should be aware of. If you have the opportunity to meet a New Feather in person, you should explain what you can. Canard does not even benefit from having a standard way of informing New Feathers of what is going on.

Hold your meetings at your discretion, if you must. But recognize the benefits -- especially considering the nature of this place. If you cannot account for a 'member' beyond their initial recruitment, should they be on your roster when a dangerous experiment or something else comes up? Case in point, the situation we are currently facing.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting